References

ACLU. 2000. http://www.aclu.org/congress/rightgenetics.html and July 19, 2000, Letter to The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy. Ranking Member Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions. 428 Dirksen Senate Office Building. Washington, D.C. 20510. http://www.aclu.org/congress/l071900a.html.

Asch, A. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy. American Journal ofPublicHealth. 89, 11, 1649.

Asch A. 1989. Reproductive technology and disability. In Cohen S, Taub N. Reproductive laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press. 69_124.

Asch A, Geller G. 1996. Feminism, bioethics and genetics. In: Wolf S, ed. Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction. New York, NY. Oxford University Press. 318-350.

Bach, JR and Tilton. MC 1994. Life satisfaction and well-being measures in ventilator assisted individuals with traumatic tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. vol. 75, 626-632.

Cameron P et al. 1973. The life satisfaction of nonnormal persons, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. vol. 41, 207-214.

Caplan, Arthur L. 1992. If gene therapy is the cure, what is the disease? in Annas, George J.; Elias, Sherman, eds. Gene mapping: Using law and ethics as guides. New York. Oxford University Press. page 128-14.

Cooley, WC et al. 1990, Reactions of mothers and medical profession to a film about Down Syndrome Am. J. Dis. Child. 144 1112.

Cushman, LA and Dijkers, MP. 1990. Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: staff perceptions and patient realities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. vol. 71. 191-196.

Eisenberg MG and Saltz. CC 1991. Quality of life among aging spinal cord injured persons: long term rehabilitation outcomes. Paraplegia. vol. 29, 514-520.

Field NIA. 1993. Killing "the handicapped" before and after birth. Harvard Women's Law J16:79-138.

Fine M, Asch A. 1982. The question of disability: no easy answers for the women's movement. Reproductive Rights Newsletter. 4(3). 19-20.

Finger, A. 1987. Past due: Disability, pregnancy and birth. Seattle. Washington Seal Press.

Kaplan D. 1994. Prenatal screening and diagnosis: the impact on persons with disabilities. In Rosenberg KHZ, Thompson JED, eds. Women and prenatal testing: Facing the challenges of genetic technology. Columbus. Ohio State University Press. 49-61.

Gerhart, KA et al. 1994. Quality of life following spinal cord injury. Knowledge and attitudes of emergency care providers. Annals of Emergency Medicine. vol. 23. 807-812.

Harris, J. 2000. Is there a coherent social conception of disability? J. of Medical Ethics 26. pp. 95-100.

Helf, C. M., & Glidden, L. M. 1998. More positive or less negative? Trends in research on adjustment of families rearing children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 36. 457-464.

Hubbard, R. 1990. The politics of women in biology. New Brunswick, NJ. Rutgers University Press. chap 12-14.

Lippman, A. 1991. Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. Am J Law Med. 17(1_2): 15_50;

Minden, S. 1984. Born and unborn: the implications of reproductive technologies for people with disabilities. In: Aridity R, Duello-Klein R, Minding S, eds. Test-tube women: What future for motherhood? Boston, Mass. Pandora Press. 298-312.

Miringoff, ML. 1991. The social costs of genetic welfare. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Ray C, West J. 1984. Social, sexual and personal implications of paraplegia. Paraplegia. 22:75-86.

Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge (eds). 2001. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer (also available at http://nano.gov).

Saigal, S, et al.; 1996. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA. 276: 453-459.

Silver, A et al. 1998. Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspective on justice in bioethics and public policy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC. Landham, Bolder, New York, Oxford.

Scorgie, K., & Sobsey, D. 2000. Transformational outcomes associated with parenting children with disabilities. MentalRetardation. 38(3), 195-206

Shapiro A1998 'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: Should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue? J. of Medical Ethics 24. 369-375.

Sobsey, D. 1990. Too much stress on stress? Abuse and the family stress factor. Quarterly Newsletter of the American Association on Mental Retardation. 3, 2, 8.

Singer. 2001. Response to Mark Kuczewski. American Journal of Bioethics. Volume 1. Number 3. p. 55-56

Stensman, S, 1985. Severely mobility-disabled people assess the quality of their lives. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. vol. 17. 87-99.

Stephens, T and Brynner, R. 2001. Dark Remedy; the impact of thalidomide. Perseus Publishing. Cambridge Massachusetts. USA page 65/66.

Strauss, SA. 1996. 'Wrongful conception', 'wrongful birth' and 'wrongful life': the first South African cases. Med. Law. 15: 161-173.

Tyson JE, Broyles RS. 1996. Progress in assessing the long-term outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants. JAMA. 276: 492-493.

UNESCO, 2000.

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001229/122938eo.pdf#xml=http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ulis.pl?database=ged&set=3BE443E4_0_108&hits_rec=3&hits_lng=eng

Watson, JD. 1996. President's essay: genes and politics. Annual Report Cold .Springs Harbor. 1996:1-20." http://www.cshl.org/96AnReport/essay1.html. Exact page http://www.cshl.org/96AnReport/essay14.html.

Wertz, DC. 1998. Eugenics is alive and well. Science in Context 11. 3-4. pp 493-510 (p501).

Whiteneck, GC et al. 1985. Rocky mountain spinal cord injury system. Report to the National Institute of Handicapped Research. 29-33.

Wolbring. 1999. Gene Watch June 1999 Vol.12 No.3;

http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org/Eugenics,%20Euthanics,%20Euphenics.html

Wolbring. 2000. Science and the disadvantaged; http://www.edmonds-institute.org/wolbring.html

Wolbring. 2001. Surviving in a technological world. In Disability and the life course: Global perspectives. Edited by Mark Priestley. Cambridge University Press.

Wolbring. 2001. 150 page single spaced expert opinion for the Study Commission on the Law and Ethics of Modern Medicine of the German Bundestag with the title "Folgen der Anwendung genetischer Diagnostik fuer behinderte Menschen" (Consequences of the application of genetic diagnostics for disabled people) http://www.bundestag.de/gremien/medi/medi_gut_wol.pdf

Wolbring. 2002a. International Center for Bioethics, Culture and Disability.

http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org/wrongfulbirth.html

Wolbring. 2002b. Wrongful birth/life suits. http://www.bioethicsanddisability.org

Woodrich, W. and Patterson, JB. 1983. Variables related to acceptance of disability in persons with spinal cord injuries. Journal of Rehabilitation. July-Sept. 26-30.

0 0

Post a comment