References

Anderson, N.C. 1997. Linking mind and brain in the study of mental illnesses. Science 275:1586-1593. Bar-Yam, Y. 1997. Dynamics of complex systems. Cambridge, Perseus Press.

Bonadio, J. 2002. Gene therapy: Reinventing the wheel or useful adjunct to existing paradigms? In Chapter C of this report.

Brain work: The neuroscience newsletter. 2002. Neuroethics: Mapping the field. Editor's note, in Vol. 12 No. 3, May-June 2002, p. 1.

Caplow, T., L. Hicks, and B.J. Wattenberg. 2001. The first measured century: An illustrated guide to trends in America, 1900-2000. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute Press.

Cauller, L. and A. Penz. 2002. Artificial brains and natural intelligence. In Chapter C of this report.

Connolly, P. 2002. Nanobiotechnology and life extension. In Chapter C of this volume.

Horn, R. 2002. Visual language. Stanford U. http://www.stanford.edu/~rhorn/index.html; http://macrovu.com/

Heller, M. 2002. The nano-bio connection and its implication for human performance. In Chapter C of this report.

Hewlett Packard. 2002. Cool town. http://www.exploratorium.edu/pr/alliance.html.

IBM. 2002. User system ergonomics research. http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/user.html.

Jorgenson, D.W., and C.W. Wessner (eds.). 2002. Measuring and sustaining the new economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Kennedy, D. 2002. Are there things we'd rather not know? Brain work: The neuroscience newsletter, Vol. 12 No. 3, May-June 2002, p. 6.

Kurzweil, R. 1999. The age of spiritual machines. New York: Viking.

Lavine, M., L. Roberts, and O. Smith. 2002. Bodybuilding: The bionic human. Science 295:995-1033.

Mowery, D.C. (ed.). 1999. U.S. industry in 2000: Studies in competitive performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Institute of Mental Health. 2002. Learning and the brain. http://www.edupr.com/brain4.html; http://www.edupr.com/bsched.html.

National Research Council. 1988. Enhancing human performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (Committee on Assessing Crop Yields). 1997. Precision agriculture in the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges). 1998. Visionary manufacturing challenges for 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (Committee on Biobased Industrial Products). 1999. Biobased industrial products: Priorities for research and commercialization. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (Committee on Supply Chain Integration). 2000. Surviving supply chain integration. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Science and Technology Council (NSTC, Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology). 2002. National Nanotechnology Initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan (detailed technical report associated with the supplemental report to the President's FY 2003 budget). White House: Washington, DC.

New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS). 2002. Unifying knowledge: The convergence of natural and human science. New York: NYAS Annals.

Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E.U. Weber. 2002. The drama of the commons. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge (eds). 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience andnanotechnology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publ. Also available at http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications.

Roco, M.C. 2002. Coherence and divergence of megatrends in science and technology. In Chapter A of this volume.

Saxl, O. 2002. Summary of conference on nanobiotechnology, life extension and the treatment of congenital and degenerative disease, institute of nanotechnology, U.K.

Spohrer, J. 2002. NBICs (nano-bio-info-cogno-socio) convergence to improve human performance: opportunities and challenges. In Chapter B of this report.

Stern, Paul C., and Laura L. Carstensen (eds.). 2000. The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Also available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9783.html.

Steve, S., R. Orpwood, M. Malot, X, and E. Zrenner. 2002. Mimicking the brain. Physics World 15(2):27-31.

United Nations Development Program. 2001. Making new technologies work for human development. Part of the 2001 Human Development Report, UK: Oxford University Press. Also available at http://www.undp.org/hdr2001/.

General Statements and Visionary Projects

The following six sets of contributions (chapters A to F) present key statements and visions from academe, private sector and government illustrating what technological convergence could achieve in the next ten to twenty years. In each set, statements are grouped at the beginning that consider the current situation in the particular area and project how we could build on it to achieve rapid progress. The later contributions in the set present visions of what might be achieved toward the end of the two-decade period. In the first of these six sets, government leaders and representatives of the private sector provide the motivation for this effort to understand the promise of converging technologies. The second and third sets of contributions identify significant ways in which the mental and physical abilities of individual humans could be improved. The third and fourth sets examine prospects on the group and societal level, one considering ways in which the internal performance of the society could benefit and the other focusing on the defense of the society against external threats to its security. The sixth and final set of essays considers the transformation of science and engineering themselves, largely through advances in education.

0 0

Post a comment