J. E. Dahl, S. G. Liu, and R. M. K. Carlson, Science 299, 96 (2003); A. P. Marchand, Science 299, 52 (2003).
 D. W. Brenner, O. A. Shenderova, D. A. Areshkin, J. D. Schall and S.-J. V. Franklan, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 3, 643 (2002); K. E. Drexler, Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation (Wiley, new York, 1992).
 J. E. Fisher and P. A. Heiney, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54, 1725 (1993)
 A. Noy, D. V. Vezenov, and C. M. Lieber, Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 27, 381 (1997).
 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian, J. B. Cross, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, and J. A. Pople (Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2003.)
 MOLPRO is a package of ab initio programs written by H. J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, with contributions from J. Almlf, R. D. Amos, M. J. O. Deegan, S. T. Elbert, C. Hampel, W. Meyer, K. Peterson, R. Pitzer, A. J. Stone, P. R. Taylor, R. Lindh, M. E. Mura, and T. Thorsteinsson.
 G. P. Zhang, X. F. Zong, and Thomas F. George, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9765 (1999).
 Actually, we initially also attempted to employ density functional theory to calculate potentials, as it is faster and in some senses includes the exchange interaction, which seems to be superior to the Hartree-Fock approximation. Our calculation showed that even with the best density functional, the total energy is lower than that of the HF calculation, but the wavefunction was found to be poor after we checked the Mulliken population for each atom against other higher-level calculations. This certainly influences the dipole transition elements.
 H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 5053 (1985); P. J. Knowles and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 115, 259 (1985).
 In retinal, whether it goes to the cis or trans configuration also depends on surrounding proteins, which regulate different barriers.
 Transition elements smaller than 0.01 D are not shown.
 F. Gai, K. C. Hasson, J. C. McDonald, and P. A. Anfinrud, Science 279,1886 (1998).
 P. E. Eaton and T. W. Cole, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 3157 (1964).
 L. Hedberg, K. Hedberg, P. E. Eaton, N. Nodari, and A. G. Robiettte, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 1514(1991).
 K. Miaskiewicz and D. A. Smith, Chem. Phys. Lett. 270,
 C. P. Vlahacos, H. F. Hameka, and J. O. Jensen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 259, 283 (1996).
 B. S. Jursic, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 394, 15 (1997).
 V. G. Zakrzewski and J. V. Ortiz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 230, 313 (1994).
 J. M. Schulman and R. L. Disch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 1202 (1984).
 A. J. Pertsin and A. I. Kitaigorodsky, Eds., The Atom-Atom Potential Method (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).
Was this article helpful?